What makes me sick
“I have no established method, no exact steps that must be undertaken to achieve good design.”
Begin.
I feel I must begin this slight dissertation on my methods with a confession and a lament. When David approached me to join xheight, my heart grew with excitement and a sense of emotional relief upon the idea of a place whence my more abstract thoughts on design could find residence. These feelings were immediately followed by anxiety. How do I formulate these thoughts into digestible, understandable paragraphs, sentences and words? How can something which resonates so viscerally with me be transcribed in written word?
It has been a full week since that moment, but I think it’s time I take the bull by the horns and dive deep into what makes me, as my moniker would have it, sick.
***
Be consistent.
I dare say that no design is created the same for me. I have no established method, no exact steps that must be undertaken to achieve good design. Moreover, I dare not create such a system for myself, for if I would, it would, surely, lead to the creation of, for lack of a better term, blocks in my creative path. It would mean restraint and while that would lead to consistency, I do not approve of conscious, forced consistency when it comes to design. But this is not some blind decision, based on an irrational fear of self sabotage.
For all this to make more sense, you need to know a bit more about me. I am, wholeheartedly, skeptical and analytical. I do not believe in things; to me proven facts matter, anything else is just blind, unsupported belief. And, to me, things that cannot be proven, that have no evidence supporting them, are useless. It is a strange fact that I am also inclined to create and dream up things. By all accounts, I shouldn’t have a creative bone in my body, and yet there is a great part of me that needs to create, every day, without pause. Because of this mind frame, and the nature and duality of design (analysis and art) I must force chaos upon myself, because analysis is my natural go-to tool.
It is a struggle I go through every day and it gives me great self satisfaction whenever I reach that perfect balance between the two sides of me, for when that balance is reached, it is then that I produce sickness.
***
Be sick.
We live in a time when people from thousands of miles away are closer than ever. It is, without a doubt, the greatest conquer of the age of circuitry, and social media is the very pinnacle of this aspect of technology. Unfortunately, we also live in a time when the most common language is English. I say unfortunately because I was not born with the privilege of living in a native English speaking country and, of course, my real name is rather difficult to pronounce, let alone remember, for a native English speaker. I was, therefore, forced to choose a name, a moniker, an easy to remember and representative wording of who I am, as many others in my situation have and will for as long as the world will speak different languages.
I chose the word sick because of it’s dual meaning. Colloquially, it is both good and bad, it can be an expression of supreme quality, and also of disgust. While my intention has never been to produce disgust, I am attracted to its curious duality. Sickdesigner is easy to remember, short, poignant and descriptive, all of which are qualities that I was looking for.
***
Armed with my chaotic approach, I try, every day, to stay true to my assumed name. I constantly ask myself is this sick? and I rely on perseverance more than anything else to help me reach the point where I can say yes, Radu, this is sick.
Pen down. Sign out.
Utwoo
I just became sicker after reading this. Really enjoyed this article, great read! Keep up the good work.
Laurie
You use the English language far more beautifully and elegantly than many native speakers (including myself).
Great read.
Radu
@Utwoo: Glad to hear it and will do!
@Laurie: That is about the nicest compliment I could ever have received. Thank you!
Chuck Wagon
If any designer has ever wondered why this profession has been taken less and less seriously over the years – it’s simply because of this kind of self-indulgent behavior.
If designers stopped obsessing about how creative they are and started focusing on the business of being creative – we would live in a world where designers were certified and not cutting each others throats over a few bucks an hour.
David Bushell
Hey Chuck – are we not allowed to enjoy design and share thoughts and ideas from our own experience? How does that in anyway relate to cutting throats over a few bucks?
You seem to be the kind that think writing about yourself is automatically self-indulgent. I’ve got news for you mate – most designers enjoy what they do. They’re inspired by ideas from others. They improve by learning from others. They aspire to help others.
Should we shut up and be negative like you, and sit in our own little world of business? Or should we step aside every now and then; share our experience with each other?
Is there an element of self-promotion here? Sure. So what? If you don’t like it the problem is with you, not everyone else. Get some perspective, enjoy what you do without hating on others. If you don’t want to collaborate – don’t. If you don’t want to discuss design – don’t. But holding such a negative opinion on those that do is only harmful to yourself.
Dillon Es
I know I am pulling this quote out of context, but “analysis and art” is an amazing definition of design.
nuvoshaman
didn’t really get anything at all from this article – there are design principles that do give a designer a base without stifling their creativity – pulling from fine art movements can lead to inspiration, talented designers like David Carson, talks by paul rand etc, there’s a lot to be pulled from out there .(without resorting to plagiarism)
the Radu article was not very inspiring.
peace mike